The United States should drop its sanctions on Cuba in order to open lines of communication that would be beneficial to both countries.
There is also no cell phone or internet use allowed Reed. Unlike Iran or North Korea, there are no indications that Cuba is seeking nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction. Lincicome is an international trade attorney, adjunct scholar with the Cato Institute and visiting lecturer at Duke University.
Moreover, the argument that the United States should only lift the embargo in response to Cuban economic and foreign policy changes imposes a nonsensical reciprocal element on what is clearly a unilateral issue.
Lifting the embargo will spread American values to Cuba, improving their economic well being and degree of freedom. I think in most cases they are appropriate only where we can think in terms of multilateral sanctions, when there is something of an international consensus willing to follow U.
The repeated response to these facts is not that they are wrong, but that they fail to justify a change in the status quo—in other words, that the embargo should stay unless I and other Americans can demonstrate that free trade and travel would markedly improve the situation in Cuba or, at the very least, not make things worse.
First, legislation codifying the embargo—i. To argue that the embargo somehow isolates the Cuban regime from anyone other than American travelers, exporters, and consumers simply defies reality.
Cuba also trades with other countries and still gets alternative U. All it does is continue to hurt the people of that country that could be doing much better, if their nation had better trade opportunities.
Those reasons never did actually materialize and, as a result, the sanctions serve no purpose today, except to continuously punish a country for failing to collapse under the pressure of an economic embargo.
Supporters of the Cuban embargo would say that the Castro brothers are oppressive. With eleven million people, it is one of the poorest nations in Latin America Griswold.
This happened originally inso it just seems ludicrous to still have them in place. Greenville Technical College Library.
I think there are occasions when an appropriate policy response by the United States is to impose sanctions on some foreign government. The Embargo was set in place because "Communism is a threat to democracy" but our fourth biggest trading partner is none other than China who shows no sign of leaving their communist ways.
The removal of trade and travel restrictions is valuable regardless of what any other country says or does, especially a tiny, tinpot dictatorship. The economic sanctions against Cuba were intended to pressure them to give up their communist government.
The government has had 18 years to demonstrate that Cuba is a manifest national security threat or that its human rights violations are different from, and somehow worse than, those of countries with whom we have normalized relations.
The open diplomatic relations of U. Castro remained in power untilwhen he was forced to hand over his powers to his brother Raul because he became sick.
The economy was made worse with the passing of three consecutive hurricanes in the summer ofnot only destroying living conditions for the people of Cuba but also destroying its already weak agricultural region Blair.
Works Cited Blair, Dennis.
One such compelling interest is national security, something even a hardcore free trader like Milton Friedman has acknowledged is a perfectly sound justification for trade and investment restrictions.
To continue sanctions is purely inactive and serves no real practical purpose. The US sanctions against Cuba have gone on far too long. Indeed, according to a study by the U. The United States government need not wait for another country to act before it expands the liberty and well-being of its own citizens.The U.S.
embargo on Cuba is hurting the U.S. economy without serving a real benefit and should be lifted.
U.S. hypocrisy is a definite part of the embargo. While it is to force democratic reform because Cuba is communist, the. Should the Cuban Embargo be Lifted? For some American’s, the knowledge they have on Cuba is ultimedescente.com is an island just 90 miles off the coast of Florida.
America has had an ongoing embargo with Cuba for over 50 years. The embargo consists of economic sanctions against Cuba and restrictions on Cuban travel and commerce for all people.
Cuba And Embargo Essay example; Should the Cuban Embargo be Lifted? Words | 8 Pages. Is the Cuban Embargo a cruel reminder of the Cold war, or is it an important factor of American Democracy fighting the spread of Communism? The Cuban Embargo was a declaration issued by American President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Is the Cuban Embargo a cruel reminder of the Cold war, or is it an important factor of American Democracy fighting the spread of Communism? The Cuban Embargo was a declaration issued by American President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. It Is Time to Lift the Cuban Embargo.
For the last forty some years, the United States of America has had a blockade on trade and travel with the nation of Cuba. However, in the past decade, there has been strong protest and lobbying to lift this long running embargo. Many people, including farmers /5(3).
Should the Cuban Embargo be Lifted? - Is the Cuban Embargo a cruel reminder of the Cold war, or is it an important factor of American Democracy fighting the spread of Communism.
The Cuban Embargo was a declaration issued by American President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.Download